Almost all the expensive breakdowns of a participatory process are temporal. And almost none of them is designed.
A process that disappears for weeks loses the trust that took months to build.
Silence is the most expensive breakdown, and nobody sees it coming because nobody is measuring it.
The usual few stay to the end and they are the ones who determine the decisions.
The meeting that runs over is not a scheduling problem: it is a frontier of exclusion that decides badly.
The elections cut the process from 18 to 8 months.
The territory's political, school and festive calendar collides with the process. Anticipating it is design; discovering it, an accident.
A single tool, three movements. Its memory lives in two plain-text files that are yours: partitura.md and pulso.md.
Times (who does this schedule leave out?), rhythm (and who sustains it), cycles with an entry window and a close, external calendar and intensities. The maximum number of simultaneous fronts is agreed in writing.
Ten minutes a week: you paste the log, the AI checks it against the Score and returns at most three alerts. Every alert ends in a question, never in an instruction.
At the close: what was promised against what was lived, six figures at most, and what the tempo taught, put in your words. It feeds the Evaluate phase, the public report-back and the report to the promoter.
The Pulse Panel: the vital state of the process in a single glance. Six figures, the rhythm drawn, and the alerts that ask.
The process is breathing: sustained rhythm and two cycles closed, but the evening session is running over and there is one front too many.
The last three sessions ran half an hour over. Who was being left out of the decisions at the end?
You agreed three fronts and the log shows four. Which of the new ones replaces which, or what stops getting done?
The other two objects of the tool: the Process Score (the cycles as arcs over the line of weeks, with the external calendar as its own band and the collisions marked) and the Tempo Memory (two timelines superimposed: the promised one, faint; the lived one, full; the distance between them is the learning, not a failing grade).
The AI does not reschedule, does not convene, does not prioritise. It is a metronome, not a conductor: the judgement is yours.
The most important thing about tempo is what is not happening: the week without activity, the cycle that does not close, the new face that did not come back.
A hundred eyes produce zero decisions. A panel that does not fit in a single glance is no use for deciding.
The working document is uploaded to the AI you already use, like modules 01 to 04. No new accounts, no platform: your process, your log, your judgement.
Start today · €19 → See the other tools